My 2010 Technology Predictions

It’s that time of the year again. Slows news cycles, the Tiger Woods saga clogging the airwaves, and everyone is looking forward to starting off fresh for the new year. 2009 was an interesting year in technology. In the first half of the year, you rarely read about new companies getting funded, startups launching, and it almost appeared that the legs got taken from out of the startup technology space. It was a tough year for startups and small businesses.

Some of the positive highlights were the mainstream emergence (and acceptance) of Twitter and social media as a viable distribution platform for content. The Real-Time web replaced the Semantic Web as the new buzzword, and everyone wanted information quicker, faster, and more in depth. Newspapers continued to flounder, and blogs gained more credibility as reliable information sources that could break news as quickly as the big players.

In 2010, we have a great deal to look forward to. An improved economy, a (gasp!) viable health care plan, and maybe some new opportunities available for small businesses and entrepreneurs. Here’s my technology predictions for 2010.

1) Google Wave will continue to flop and will eventually fold

As someone that loves technology, especially web technology, it troubles me to say this, but Google Wave is useless. It is supposed to act as a replacement for e-mail, IM, and chat rooms all grouped into an ambitious interface. The problem is, it is beyond user unfriendly. For the people that I connect with on Wave, they are your typical early adopter techies. People that can figure out interfaces fairly quickly. Even they are clueless and rarely use it, opting for gchat instead. Google Wave, like all Google products, get tremendous free press (and expectations), because one day they are supposed to take over the world. Google Knol was supposed to be a Wikipedia-killer in 2009, and we see how far that went. I expect the same thing for Google Wave, and by the end of 2010, you will not be able to register new accounts.
2) Importance of real-time will soften. Real time search is overrated

Real-time search is a fun topic. It’s going to transform how we search for information, and the power of publishing content from anywhere with any device is transformative. How monetizable it is, will be another question. When Michael Jackson passed away, I learned it firstly on Twitter, but it was similar to how I would get a text message from a friend letting me know.

Twitter and Facebook enables me to connect with others that I wouldn’t have otherwise been able to, with a velocity of information transfer augmenting word of mouth. There are going to be those that will do a google search and only want real-time results, but I suspect that it will be a minority. YouTube is a video search, but I haven’t read too many press releases that suggest the earnings from that are more than a scratch on Google’s quarterly earnings. I think with the notion of real time is great in theory, but how sustainable is it, when folks inevitably game the system?

How do you filter spam, and still make it real time? The PageRank system is bulletproof because it has several components to make gaming the system increasingly difficult. I suspect that it’s virtually impossible for a true Real-Time web. When the Real Time spammers come out, is the integrity of the search listings going to remain? An influx of spam would immediately turn me off.

3) Twitter won’t be nearly as big as predicted

Yeah, I said it. I’m a major Twitter user, but as a conversational platform, there’s nothing out there that’s better. As a source of information, there’s nothing out there that’s better. As a multi-billion dollar company? I don’t think so. Yes, there are a minority of folks that will pay for analytics and better tools, but how many have to pay for it, at what cost, to make it a billion dollar entity? With new (and active) Twitter users decreasing on a month over month basis, you wonder if that many folks who aren’t on Twitter will get on Twitter. I wrote before about how with Facebook innovating in response to Twitter, it has decreased the need for many who would have gone to Twitter, to go to Twitter. I also think there’s a clear distinction between a conversational platform and an information distribution platform. If you parse out what percentage falls in either category, you may find that Twitter is more a chat room (difficult to monetize) versus your real time news (monetizable).

4) Toyboy woozees will take off

Woozees, the programmable toys that have a wifi connection is simply a game changer. They have taken the concept of a regular toy, and created a development platform to make the toys more dynamic. Think Teddy Rupskin meets the iPhone. The opportunities are endless and if they can own the development platform standard, they will do quite well.

5) Facebook will continue its dominance

Facebook innovates like no other leading company. They have perfected the social graph, created a relatively open platform, and are growing like a weed, despite being in the lead. They overtook MySpace and even forced MySpace to position itself from a social networking site to a content provider. They acquired FriendFeed in 2009, and unless Twitter does something dramatic, Facebook will continue to be the king of the hill. Facebook and Twitter will soon add geotagging, which should swiftly threaten apps like Foursquare.

6) iPhone will be on non-AT&T carriers

I’m highly biased, by AT&T has given me the worst phone service that I have ever experienced. Those commercials that show the map of coverage comparing Verizon and AT&T are spot on. Apple has to be concerned because it reflects poorly on the iPhone since they are married to each other. Rumors are circulating that in the next year, the contract will end and Apple will be able to negotiate what provider(s) they want to go to. With the relative success of the Droid, Apple will probably look to increase their market share, and will go away from an exclusive contract. The iPhone will either have to be on T-Mobile or AT&T because the frequency (GSM) that the iPhone uses can only work for AT&T or T-Mobile networks while Verizon, Sprint use CDMA. They’d have to engineer a brand new CDMA iPhone for that. I’d still take T-Mobile any day over AT&T. AT&T is going to need more than Luke Wilson to save the day.

7) Smartphone adoption will start driving down data plan costs

Coupled with number 6, there are going to be a battle with smartphones, as the number sold continues to accelerate. If carriers don’t lower their costs, they are risking losing customers because someone inevitably is going to set a price war in the same way that a carrier first offered unlimited minute call plans. A phone in 2010 without Twitter, Facebook, and seamless surfing of the web is a thing of the past. I can’t really imagine using a phone that doesn’t have downloadable apps.

8 ) VC funding will continue to escalate

There was an uptick in VC funding of startups towards the middle to the end of this year. It stems from signs of a stabilizing economy but I think it has more to do with the fact that these funds are sitting on a boat load of cash and still need to put these funds to use. They have used the capital needed to stabilize their portfolio companies and are ready to do business once again. Next year, look for total capital invested by institutional funds to increase markedly over 2009.

9) The newspaper business model of charging for content and blocking Google would work, but none of these publications will ever try and see if it would work

It’s more of a gut feeling, but people are willing to pay for content if it’s high quality. When I open the Sun Times, I see too many Associated Press articles. Why would I pay for that? I want hyper local news that’s quality, and gives me a perspective that’s informed and worth paying for.

So what do you think of these predictions? Any predictions of your own?

Advertisements

10 responses to “My 2010 Technology Predictions

  1. I’m with you on Twitter. I’ve told lots of folks that Twitter is fine as it is, but it’s some sort of tour de force that’s going to revolutionize anything. It’s just a better form of IM.

    It’ll be interesting what becomes of Wave, I don’t think Google will abandon it quickly, but I could see them folding it into something else or say, taking it offline and revamping it. Really, it just needs to be scaled better. Right now, the biggest problem I have with it, it’s just another thing to check and so, the conversations get ignored.

    For predictions? I think Facebook’s dominance will be cut into by an upstart. More of these dominant firms are cannibalizing many of the young upstarts before they can emerge or letting them languish until their capital dries up and then buys them for pennies on the dollar. Since none of them have found a business model yet, the VC shrinkage is going to prevent as many of them from entering the market than we’ve seen before, but…the tumblr craze makes me believe that we’re going to see some sort of upstart that no one sees coming emerge from the fray — in part because I think people just need a new toy to coalesce around.

  2. Thanks Ron for stopping by! I like your prediction. It’s interesting, Tumblr and Posterous have fascinated me as of late. I’ve seen alot of folks use it and use it often. It’ll be interesting to see what they evolve into next year.

  3. You made some bold predictions here, I’m not sure I agree with some of them though. If Twitter can monitize, it will be booming, companies are already all on Twitter and web sites/ social networks have all linked to it. They gave it its staying power.

    I- Phone is suppose to be on Verizon in 2010, but I think they will have a hard time winning that battle with AT&T so soon. They have already drawn the battle lines, so while we know it will happen, I doubt 2010 will be the time.

    I just doubt this new newspaper model will work, I have seen some papers do this, and they will need some sort of formula for success.

    I think real time search is transormational, but its yet to be seen, so I understand your prediction on this one…

  4. Pingback: My 2010 Technology Predictions « These two cents by Emile Cambry Jr « Real Life Hitch

  5. @Brian, yeah, I definitely went bold with this one. If Twitter can monetize is a big, big question. Everyone thought MySpace was going to be the next Yahoo. It was a conversational platform, not a content platform. If it weren’t for the billion dollar Google deal, we’d be thinking about social networking sites quite differently. About real time, I had a friend on Twitter game the system 5 times out of 5, quite easily. Imagine if you had an army of 1,000 spammers and bots that were able to throw a wrench in the system.

  6. Comments from Facebook:

    Chang Liu:
    Google Voice will slowly start to replace certain calling plans.

    Peter Wilhelm
    Nice! I think 2010 is where we see that old debate of ours about video streaming services take a leader. I’ve tried Amazon on TiVo, PlayStation Network on PS3, Netflix on TiVo and PS3, and Hulu on the PC (I’m anti Apple still so ignoring iTunes). They all are fledgling now but will sort out the lack of titles, functionality (simple fast forward/… See Morereverse should work right Netflix!), and quality in 2010. Netflix’s Starz loophole is supposed to get plugged tho so we’ll see how they do, and as much as I wish it were PS3, Sony’s strength as a content owner is also a weakness competitively.

    Chris Liu:
    I dunno if this is coming out in 2010 but its definitely a technology to watch cause it has so many applications because of speech/facial/body recognition.

    xbox project natal

  7. I am not sold that the iPhone will be on another provider. If you think the coverage on AT&T is bad, T-Mobile is much worse. The only way it ends up on T-Mobile is if AT&T buys them.

    I don’t see the iPhone on Verizon as Apple won’t downgrade the technology in their phone to suit Verizon.

    I agree with the increase in VC activity. I think that BX is poised to do the most in 2010 in the private equity/VC arena. The fact that they have 20+ billion in cash and 5-6 IPOs scheduled in the coming months is promising.

    Your prediction on smart phone adoption is close, but I think another year or two away. If we all lived in cities with a downtown wifi network that covered the entire city, then yes we can do all we want, Twitter, Facebook, gchat, email and make calls with VOIP. But until wifi is that widespread or 3G gets fast enough to hold a VOIP call, I don’t see it happening. Unless you can start a VOIP call at home, jump in the car and go to the grocery store/work without losing the call I don’t see it happening.

    My prediction is that Google Android on netbooks will start to pop up. The netbook has a lot of potential. Especially with cloud computing starting to catch on. If you can run the guts of a program on a server and just display it on the netbook, that’s big. At a $300 price point netbooks are going to be hard to beat.

  8. @Curtis Thanks man for stopping by. Great comments, especially from an engineer. The Android on netbooks is a huge opportunity, especially in developing/emerging nations as well.

  9. More comments from Facebook:

    Christopher Liu
    Totally agree i don’t see 2010 or maybe even 2011 on the full features but it is working as a prototype as this video shows.

    This kind of technology can then be used to program a robot or such to mimic human movement easier and identify objects for the robot to manipulate and such.
    … See More
    Or even the security applications of such technology.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s