<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for These two cents by Emile Cambry Jr</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emilecambry.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emilecambry.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Technology is an enabling force to make our lives simpler</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 04:27:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on My 2010 Technology Predictions by emilecambry</title>
		<link>http://emilecambry.wordpress.com/2009/12/10/2010-technology-predictions/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>emilecambry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 04:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emilecambry.wordpress.com/?p=719#comment-219</guid>
		<description>More comments from Facebook:

Christopher Liu
Totally agree i don&#039;t see 2010 or maybe even 2011 on the full features but it is working as a prototype as this video shows.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YL06VwEmgzI

This kind of technology can then be used to program a robot or such to mimic human movement easier and identify objects for the robot to manipulate and such.
... See More
Or even the security applications of such technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More comments from Facebook:</p>
<p>Christopher Liu<br />
Totally agree i don&#8217;t see 2010 or maybe even 2011 on the full features but it is working as a prototype as this video shows.<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YL06VwEmgzI" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YL06VwEmgzI</a></p>
<p>This kind of technology can then be used to program a robot or such to mimic human movement easier and identify objects for the robot to manipulate and such.<br />
&#8230; See More<br />
Or even the security applications of such technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My 2010 Technology Predictions by emilecambry</title>
		<link>http://emilecambry.wordpress.com/2009/12/10/2010-technology-predictions/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>emilecambry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 03:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emilecambry.wordpress.com/?p=719#comment-218</guid>
		<description>@Curtis Thanks man for stopping by. Great comments, especially from an engineer. The Android on netbooks is a huge opportunity, especially in developing/emerging nations as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Curtis Thanks man for stopping by. Great comments, especially from an engineer. The Android on netbooks is a huge opportunity, especially in developing/emerging nations as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My 2010 Technology Predictions by Curtis Lane</title>
		<link>http://emilecambry.wordpress.com/2009/12/10/2010-technology-predictions/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>Curtis Lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 03:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emilecambry.wordpress.com/?p=719#comment-217</guid>
		<description>I am not sold that the iPhone will be on another provider.  If you think the coverage on AT&amp;T is bad, T-Mobile is much worse.  The only way it ends up on T-Mobile is if AT&amp;T buys them.  

 I don&#039;t see the iPhone on Verizon as Apple won&#039;t downgrade the technology in their phone to suit Verizon.  

I agree with the increase in VC activity.  I think that BX is poised to do the most in 2010 in the private equity/VC arena.  The fact that they have 20+ billion in cash and 5-6 IPOs scheduled in the coming months is promising.  

    Your prediction on smart phone adoption is close, but I think another year or two away.  If we all lived in cities with a downtown wifi network that covered the entire city, then yes we can do all we want, Twitter, Facebook, gchat, email and make calls with VOIP.  But until wifi is that widespread or 3G gets fast enough to hold a VOIP call, I don&#039;t see it happening.  Unless you can start a VOIP call at home, jump in the car and go to the grocery store/work without losing the call I don&#039;t see it happening.  

My prediction is that Google Android on netbooks will start to pop up.  The netbook has a lot of potential.  Especially with cloud computing starting to catch on.  If you can run the guts of a program on a server and just display it on the netbook, that&#039;s big. At a $300 price point netbooks are going to be hard to beat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sold that the iPhone will be on another provider.  If you think the coverage on AT&amp;T is bad, T-Mobile is much worse.  The only way it ends up on T-Mobile is if AT&amp;T buys them.  </p>
<p> I don&#8217;t see the iPhone on Verizon as Apple won&#8217;t downgrade the technology in their phone to suit Verizon.  </p>
<p>I agree with the increase in VC activity.  I think that BX is poised to do the most in 2010 in the private equity/VC arena.  The fact that they have 20+ billion in cash and 5-6 IPOs scheduled in the coming months is promising.  </p>
<p>    Your prediction on smart phone adoption is close, but I think another year or two away.  If we all lived in cities with a downtown wifi network that covered the entire city, then yes we can do all we want, Twitter, Facebook, gchat, email and make calls with VOIP.  But until wifi is that widespread or 3G gets fast enough to hold a VOIP call, I don&#8217;t see it happening.  Unless you can start a VOIP call at home, jump in the car and go to the grocery store/work without losing the call I don&#8217;t see it happening.  </p>
<p>My prediction is that Google Android on netbooks will start to pop up.  The netbook has a lot of potential.  Especially with cloud computing starting to catch on.  If you can run the guts of a program on a server and just display it on the netbook, that&#8217;s big. At a $300 price point netbooks are going to be hard to beat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My 2010 Technology Predictions by emilecambry</title>
		<link>http://emilecambry.wordpress.com/2009/12/10/2010-technology-predictions/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>emilecambry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emilecambry.wordpress.com/?p=719#comment-216</guid>
		<description>Comments from Facebook:

Chang Liu:
Google Voice will slowly start to replace certain calling plans.

Peter Wilhelm
Nice! I think 2010 is where we see that old debate of ours about video streaming services take a leader. I&#039;ve tried Amazon on TiVo, PlayStation Network on PS3, Netflix on TiVo and PS3, and Hulu on the PC (I&#039;m anti Apple still so ignoring iTunes). They all are fledgling now but will sort out the lack of titles, functionality (simple fast forward/... See Morereverse should work right Netflix!), and quality in 2010. Netflix&#039;s Starz loophole is supposed to get plugged tho so we&#039;ll see how they do, and as much as I wish it were PS3, Sony&#039;s strength as a content owner is also a weakness competitively.

Chris Liu:
I dunno if this is coming out in 2010 but its definitely a technology to watch cause it has so many applications because of speech/facial/body recognition.

xbox project natal
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2qlHoxPioM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comments from Facebook:</p>
<p>Chang Liu:<br />
Google Voice will slowly start to replace certain calling plans.</p>
<p>Peter Wilhelm<br />
Nice! I think 2010 is where we see that old debate of ours about video streaming services take a leader. I&#8217;ve tried Amazon on TiVo, PlayStation Network on PS3, Netflix on TiVo and PS3, and Hulu on the PC (I&#8217;m anti Apple still so ignoring iTunes). They all are fledgling now but will sort out the lack of titles, functionality (simple fast forward/&#8230; See Morereverse should work right Netflix!), and quality in 2010. Netflix&#8217;s Starz loophole is supposed to get plugged tho so we&#8217;ll see how they do, and as much as I wish it were PS3, Sony&#8217;s strength as a content owner is also a weakness competitively.</p>
<p>Chris Liu:<br />
I dunno if this is coming out in 2010 but its definitely a technology to watch cause it has so many applications because of speech/facial/body recognition.</p>
<p>xbox project natal<br />
<span style="text-align:center; display: block;"><a href="http://emilecambry.wordpress.com/2009/12/10/2010-technology-predictions/"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/p2qlHoxPioM/2.jpg" alt="" /></a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My 2010 Technology Predictions by emilecambry</title>
		<link>http://emilecambry.wordpress.com/2009/12/10/2010-technology-predictions/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>emilecambry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emilecambry.wordpress.com/?p=719#comment-215</guid>
		<description>@Brian, yeah, I definitely went bold with this one. If Twitter can monetize is a big, big question. Everyone thought MySpace was going to be the next Yahoo. It was a conversational platform, not a content platform. If it weren&#039;t for the billion dollar Google deal, we&#039;d be thinking about social networking sites quite differently. About real time,  I had a friend on Twitter game the system 5 times out of 5, quite easily. Imagine if you had an army of 1,000 spammers and bots that were able to throw a wrench in the system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brian, yeah, I definitely went bold with this one. If Twitter can monetize is a big, big question. Everyone thought MySpace was going to be the next Yahoo. It was a conversational platform, not a content platform. If it weren&#8217;t for the billion dollar Google deal, we&#8217;d be thinking about social networking sites quite differently. About real time,  I had a friend on Twitter game the system 5 times out of 5, quite easily. Imagine if you had an army of 1,000 spammers and bots that were able to throw a wrench in the system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My 2010 Technology Predictions by AdSenseHolic</title>
		<link>http://emilecambry.wordpress.com/2009/12/10/2010-technology-predictions/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>AdSenseHolic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 06:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emilecambry.wordpress.com/?p=719#comment-214</guid>
		<description>I like your prediction</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your prediction</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My 2010 Technology Predictions by My 2010 Technology Predictions « These two cents by Emile Cambry Jr &#171; Real Life Hitch</title>
		<link>http://emilecambry.wordpress.com/2009/12/10/2010-technology-predictions/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>My 2010 Technology Predictions « These two cents by Emile Cambry Jr &#171; Real Life Hitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 05:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emilecambry.wordpress.com/?p=719#comment-213</guid>
		<description>[...] December 10, 2009 · 4 Comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] December 10, 2009 · 4 Comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My 2010 Technology Predictions by Brian Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://emilecambry.wordpress.com/2009/12/10/2010-technology-predictions/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 03:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emilecambry.wordpress.com/?p=719#comment-212</guid>
		<description>You made some bold predictions here, I&#039;m not sure I agree with some of them though. If Twitter can monitize, it will be booming, companies are already all on Twitter and web sites/ social networks have all linked to it. They gave it its staying power.

I- Phone is suppose to be on Verizon in 2010, but I think they will have a hard time winning that battle with AT&amp;T so soon. They have already drawn the battle lines, so while we know it will happen, I doubt 2010 will be the time.

I just doubt this new newspaper model will work, I have seen some papers do this, and they will need some sort of formula for success.

I think real time search is transormational, but its yet to be seen, so I understand your prediction on this one...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You made some bold predictions here, I&#8217;m not sure I agree with some of them though. If Twitter can monitize, it will be booming, companies are already all on Twitter and web sites/ social networks have all linked to it. They gave it its staying power.</p>
<p>I- Phone is suppose to be on Verizon in 2010, but I think they will have a hard time winning that battle with AT&amp;T so soon. They have already drawn the battle lines, so while we know it will happen, I doubt 2010 will be the time.</p>
<p>I just doubt this new newspaper model will work, I have seen some papers do this, and they will need some sort of formula for success.</p>
<p>I think real time search is transormational, but its yet to be seen, so I understand your prediction on this one&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My 2010 Technology Predictions by emilecambry</title>
		<link>http://emilecambry.wordpress.com/2009/12/10/2010-technology-predictions/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>emilecambry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emilecambry.wordpress.com/?p=719#comment-209</guid>
		<description>Thanks Ron for stopping by! I like your prediction. It&#039;s interesting, Tumblr and Posterous have fascinated me as of late. I&#039;ve seen alot of folks use it and use it often. It&#039;ll be interesting to see what they evolve into next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ron for stopping by! I like your prediction. It&#8217;s interesting, Tumblr and Posterous have fascinated me as of late. I&#8217;ve seen alot of folks use it and use it often. It&#8217;ll be interesting to see what they evolve into next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My 2010 Technology Predictions by Ron</title>
		<link>http://emilecambry.wordpress.com/2009/12/10/2010-technology-predictions/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emilecambry.wordpress.com/?p=719#comment-208</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you on Twitter. I&#039;ve told lots of folks that Twitter is fine as it is, but it&#039;s some sort of tour de force that&#039;s going to revolutionize anything. It&#039;s just a better form of IM. 

It&#039;ll be interesting what becomes of Wave, I don&#039;t think Google will abandon it quickly, but I could see them folding it into something else or say, taking it offline and revamping it. Really, it just needs to be scaled better. Right now, the biggest problem I have with it, it&#039;s just another thing to check and so, the conversations get ignored.

For predictions? I think Facebook&#039;s dominance will be cut into by an upstart. More of these dominant firms are cannibalizing many of the young upstarts before they can emerge or letting them languish until their capital dries up and then buys them for pennies on the dollar. Since none of them have found a business model yet, the VC shrinkage is going to prevent as many of them from entering the market than we&#039;ve seen before, but...the tumblr craze makes me believe that we&#039;re going to see some sort of upstart that no one sees coming emerge from the fray -- in part because I think people just need a new toy to coalesce around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you on Twitter. I&#8217;ve told lots of folks that Twitter is fine as it is, but it&#8217;s some sort of tour de force that&#8217;s going to revolutionize anything. It&#8217;s just a better form of IM. </p>
<p>It&#8217;ll be interesting what becomes of Wave, I don&#8217;t think Google will abandon it quickly, but I could see them folding it into something else or say, taking it offline and revamping it. Really, it just needs to be scaled better. Right now, the biggest problem I have with it, it&#8217;s just another thing to check and so, the conversations get ignored.</p>
<p>For predictions? I think Facebook&#8217;s dominance will be cut into by an upstart. More of these dominant firms are cannibalizing many of the young upstarts before they can emerge or letting them languish until their capital dries up and then buys them for pennies on the dollar. Since none of them have found a business model yet, the VC shrinkage is going to prevent as many of them from entering the market than we&#8217;ve seen before, but&#8230;the tumblr craze makes me believe that we&#8217;re going to see some sort of upstart that no one sees coming emerge from the fray &#8212; in part because I think people just need a new toy to coalesce around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
